Renault Grand Scenic JM (2nd gen) (2004-2008) reliability
Renault Grand Scenic JM (2nd gen) built around 2008: more dangerous faults than average
Testers find a dangerous fault on Renault Grand Scenic JM (2nd gen) models built around 2008 more often than on similar cars the same age. Look closely at the tyres on any car you view. An independent inspection matters more than the wider numbers on cars this old.
Looking at a Renault Grand Scenic JM (2nd gen) right now?
Enter its number plate to see its full MOT history, risk rating and running costs.
Key figure
11% of MOT tests on Renault Grand Scenic JM (2nd gen) models built around 2008 found a fault the tester marked as dangerous, against 8% for similar cars the same age.
Most common issue
The most common MOT issue on Renault Grand Scenic JM (2nd gen) models built around 2008 involves the tyres.

Based on 3,307 tests of Grand Scenic models registered 2004-2008.
About 1 in 10 Grand Scenic JM (2nd gen) MOTs (10.5%) failed and still hadn't passed 3 days later. That's for cars built around 2008 (17 years old), all fuels combined.
Based on 1,163 tests (DVSA MOT results, 2025). A fail that passed a retest within 3 days, even the same day, isn't counted. Nor is a fail with no later MOT on record.
About 1 in 9 Grand Scenic JM (2nd gen) MOTs (10.7%) found at least one dangerous defect. These are cars built around 2008 (17 years old).
Based on 1,163 tests (DVSA MOT results, 2025). Dangerous is the most serious grade an MOT gives: a direct risk to road safety.
JM (2nd gen) fail rate by age
Fail rate is the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests. How we count fail rates Build years are worked out from age, so they are approximate. Tests counted are 2025 MOTs. Highest fail rate at 16 years old.
How the Grand Scenic JM (2nd gen) compares
At each age below, see how the Grand Scenic JM (2nd gen) holds up against other cars the same age. The averages combine all fuel types.
Based on 50,771 tests across 13 Renault models, built around 2008 (17 years old).
Fail rate is the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests. How we count fail rates Build years are worked out from age, so they are approximate. Tests counted are 2025 MOTs.
What to check before viewing
The model's most common MOT issues, turned into things you can ask about or look for.
Independent inspection
High priorityHave an independent specialist inspect the car before you commit.
Brake discs
High priorityAsk for the date and mileage of the last disc replacement; visually check for a deep wear lip and rust pitting on each disc.
Tyres
Worth checkingCheck tread depth across the full width on all four; uneven wear suggests alignment or suspension issues.
Suspension bushes and joints
Worth checkingListen for knocks over speed bumps and ask about recent control-arm or anti-roll-bar work.
Suspension springs
Worth checkingCheck ride height is even side-to-side and look for cracked or rusted coils.
Vehicle-specific check
Worth checkingCheck the car’s number plate on MOT Wise to see its own MOT history and any recalls for its build years.
Other people carriers to compare
Other people carriers, with each one's figures taken at the same age as the Grand Scenic JM (2nd gen).
- 1

Toyota Estima
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 21.1%
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- 4.5%
- Dangerous
- 5.4%
Lower fail rate: 21.1%, against 37.1% for the Renault Grand Scenic JM (2nd gen), both built around 2008.
1,330 MOT tests on cars built around 2008
- 2

Toyota Alphard
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 21%
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- 6.2%
- Dangerous
- 5.6%
Lower fail rate: 21.0%, against 37.1% for the Renault Grand Scenic JM (2nd gen), both built around 2008.
2,023 MOT tests on cars built around 2008
- 3

Nissan Elgrand
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 23.1%
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- 8.5%
- Dangerous
- 8.2%
Lower fail rate: 23.1%, against 37.1% for the Renault Grand Scenic JM (2nd gen), both built around 2008.
2,345 MOT tests on cars built around 2008
- 4

Volkswagen Caddy
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 29.6%
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- 9.4%
- Dangerous
- 6.9%
- Still registered at 10 years
- 88.8%
Lower fail rate: 29.5%, against 37.1% for the Renault Grand Scenic JM (2nd gen), both built around 2008.
6,217 MOT tests on cars built around 2008
- Fail rate
- = the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests.
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- = the share of MOT tests that failed and still hadn't passed 3 days later. A fail that passed a retest within 3 days, even the same day, isn't counted.
- Dangerous
- = the share of MOT tests where the tester marked a fault as dangerous. It is against the law to drive the car until it is fixed.
- Still registered at 10 years
- = the share of cars still registered (taxed or declared off the road) 10 years after they were first registered.
How many are still registered
UK average for cars first registered in 2014 to 2015: 92% · Fewer than typical
The share still registered can reflect demand, the cost of repairs, exports, write-offs and how owners use the car. It isn't proof of how long the car lasts mechanically.
Source: DfT vehicle licensing statistics (VEH0124).
Recall context
5 recalls in allIncludes recalls GOV.UK files under the Renault Scenic, the model this one is based on.
All 5 Grand Scenic JM (2nd gen) recalls cover cars built in these years.
- 5 recalls
Top concerns
- Unexpected application of parking brake
- Possible loss of power assistance to the steering
- Brakes may fail
For the exact car, check GOV.UK's recall checker with the number plate.
What has gone wrong on Grand Scenic JM (2nd gen) cars built around 2008
The share of petrol cars that have ever failed an MOT on each part of the car. Based on 213 cars.
How Grand Scenic JM (2nd gen) cars have aged
How Grand Scenic JM (2nd gen) cars have aged
How fail rates have changed as these cars got older. Each line follows cars first registered in about the same year across several years of MOT data. Not a prediction for any one car.
Some lines cover only a year or two, so read this as a rough guide.
How each part holds up as JM (2nd gen) cars age
How each part holds up as JM (2nd gen) cars age
The share of petrol cars built 2005-2008 that have ever failed an MOT on each part of the car. Rates usually rise with age, but can dip slightly as cars leave the road.
| Part of the car | 17 years | 18 years | 19 years | 20 years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suspension | 69% | 76% | 65% | 74% |
| Brakes | 64% | 68% | 66% | 73% |
| Emissions | 12% | 19% | 17% | 26% |
| Tyres | 62% | 62% | 61% | 65% |
| Lighting | 86% | 90% | 80% | 82% |
| Drivetrain | 26% | 36% | 14% | 11% |
| Bodywork | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% |
| Steering | 26% | 25% | 29% | 25% |
| Corrosion | 2% | 6% | 4% | 3% |
Based on petrol cars in the 2005-2008 build-year band, from 213 to 1,037 cars at each age.
Most common issues on Renault Grand Scenics of this age
This list covers every Renault Grand Scenic built around 2008, whichever generation it is. We don't have a defect list for the JM (2nd gen) on its own.
Most common advisories and fails
In order of the share of MOT tests that recorded each one
- 127.8%Advisory
Tyre worn close to the legal limit or worn on the edge
- 224.5%Advisory
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened
- 318.0%Advisory
Suspension arm pin or bush worn, but not moving too much
- 416.9%Advisory
Oil leak, but not excessive
- 515.4%Advisory
Coil spring corroded
Based on 1,163 tests
Looking at a Renault Grand Scenic JM (2nd gen) right now?
Enter its number plate to see its full MOT history, risk rating and running costs.
Frequently asked questions
Built around 2008 (17 years old), the Renault Grand Scenic JM (2nd gen) (2004-2008) fails MOTs noticeably more often than typical for this age. This is based on 1,163 17-year-old MOT tests from DVSA data. Each retest counts as a test.