Kia Cerato LD (1st gen) (2004-2009) reliability
Kia Cerato LD (1st gen) built around 2006: not enough MOT data yet
We've only seen a handful of Kia Cerato LD (1st gen) models built around 2006 so far. Too few to spot a pattern yet.
Looking at a Kia Cerato LD (1st gen) right now?
Enter its number plate to see its full MOT history, risk rating and running costs.
Key figure
Check a car’s number plate to see its own MOT record, or come back when there’s more MOT history.

Based on 665 tests of Cerato models registered 2004-2009.
LD (1st gen) fail rate by age
Fail rate is the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests. How we count fail rates Build years are worked out from age, so they are approximate. Tests counted are 2025 MOTs. Highest fail rate at 18 years old.
How the Cerato LD (1st gen) compares
At each age below, see how the Cerato LD (1st gen) holds up against other cars the same age. The averages combine all fuel types.
Based on 8,819 tests across 8 Kia models, built around 2006 (19 years old).
Fail rate is the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests. How we count fail rates Build years are worked out from age, so they are approximate. Tests counted are 2025 MOTs.
What to check before viewing
The model's most common MOT issues, turned into things you can ask about or look for.
Brake pipes and hoses
High priorityLook under the car for corrosion or chafing on the rigid brake pipes near the rear axle.
Suspension bushes and joints
Worth checkingListen for knocks over speed bumps and ask about recent control-arm or anti-roll-bar work.
Suspension
Worth checkingInspect the suspension carefully and ask the seller for repair history.
Tyres
Worth checkingCheck tread depth across the full width on all four; uneven wear suggests alignment or suspension issues.
Vehicle-specific check
Worth checkingCheck the car’s number plate on MOT Wise to see its own MOT history and any recalls for its build years.
Other hatchbacks to compare
Other hatchbacks, with each one's figures taken at the same age as the Cerato LD (1st gen).
- 1

Subaru Impreza
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 21%
Lower fail rate: 21.0%, against 35.5% for the Kia Cerato LD (1st gen), both built around 2006.
2 critical recall campaigns matching this model/build period.
2,256 MOT tests on cars built around 2006
- 2

Toyota Prius
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 29.2%
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- 5.5%
- Dangerous
- 5.9%
- Still registered at 10 years
- 94.4%
Lower fail rate: 29.2%, against 35.5% for the Kia Cerato LD (1st gen), both built around 2006.
5 critical recall campaigns matching this model/build period.
3,519 MOT tests on cars built around 2006
- 3

Toyota Corolla
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 29.7%
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- 5.6%
- Dangerous
- 7.1%
Lower fail rate: 29.7%, against 35.5% for the Kia Cerato LD (1st gen), both built around 2006.
7 critical recall campaigns matching this model/build period.
14,210 MOT tests on cars built around 2006
- 4

BMW 1 Series
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 28.4%
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- 7.8%
- Dangerous
- 7.5%
- Still registered at 10 years
- 92.1%
Lower fail rate: 28.4%, against 35.5% for the Kia Cerato LD (1st gen), both built around 2006.
12 critical recall campaigns matching this model/build period.
7,482 MOT tests on cars built around 2006
- Fail rate
- = the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests.
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- = the share of MOT tests that failed and still hadn't passed 3 days later. A fail that passed a retest within 3 days, even the same day, isn't counted.
- Dangerous
- = the share of MOT tests where the tester marked a fault as dangerous. It is against the law to drive the car until it is fixed.
- Still registered at 10 years
- = the share of cars still registered (taxed or declared off the road) 10 years after they were first registered.
Recall context
DVSA's recall list has no recalls filed under the Kia Cerato name. For the exact car, check with the maker or GOV.UK's recall checker.
What has gone wrong on Cerato LD (1st gen) cars built around 2006
The share of petrol cars that have ever failed an MOT on each part of the car. Based on 88 cars.
Rust, which the MOT calls corrosion: 16% of these cars show rust-related issues at this age.
Check the sills, subframe and brake pipes before you decide.
How Cerato LD (1st gen) cars have aged
How Cerato LD (1st gen) cars have aged
How fail rates have changed as these cars got older. Each line follows cars first registered in about the same year across several years of MOT data. Not a prediction for any one car.
LD (1st gen) variants compared
Most common issues on Kia Ceratos of this age
This list covers every Kia Cerato built around 2006, whichever generation it is. We don't have a defect list for the LD (1st gen) on its own.
Most common advisories and fails
In order of the share of MOT tests that recorded each one
- 131.8%Advisory
Brake pipe corroded or covered in grease
- 226.2%Advisory
Suspension arm pin or bush worn, but not moving too much
- 321.8%Advisory
Tyre worn close to the legal limit or worn on the edge
- 419.3%Advisory
Suspension part corroded, but not seriously weakened
- 517.8%Advisory
Tyre slightly damaged, cracking or perishing
Based on 321 tests
Looking at a Kia Cerato LD (1st gen) right now?
Enter its number plate to see its full MOT history, risk rating and running costs.
Frequently asked questions
Built around 2006 (19 years old), the Kia Cerato LD (1st gen) (2004-2009) fails MOTs noticeably more often than typical for this age. This is based on 321 19-year-old MOT tests from DVSA data. Each retest counts as a test.