Skip to main content
Check

Chrysler Grand Voyager RT (5th gen) (2008-2015) reliability

Not enough data

Chrysler Grand Voyager RT (5th gen) built around 2015: not enough MOT data yet

We've only seen a handful of Chrysler Grand Voyager RT (5th gen) models built around 2015 so far. Too few to spot a pattern yet.

Looking at a Chrysler Grand Voyager RT (5th gen) right now?

Enter its number plate to see its full MOT history, risk rating and running costs.

Key figure

Check a car’s number plate to see its own MOT record, or come back when there’s more MOT history.

Chrysler Grand Voyager RT (5th gen)
No reliability rating: not enough tests to rate2008-2015MPVDIESEL / PETROL

Based on 3,447 tests of Grand Voyager models registered 2008-2015.

RT (5th gen) fail rate by age

Below typicalAbove typicalHigh (28% or more)Highest fail rateUK average for cars this age
Age / builtFail rateMOT tests
10 yearsbuilt around 2015
22428.1%
11 yearsbuilt around 2014
54328.5%
12 yearsbuilt around 2013
39028.2%
13 yearsbuilt around 2012
47429.1%
14 yearsbuilt around 2011
47829.7%
15 yearsbuilt around 2010
44430.6%
16 yearsbuilt around 2009
48531.3%
17 yearsbuilt around 2008
40935.4%

Fail rate is the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests. How we count fail rates Build years are worked out from age, so they are approximate. Tests counted are 2025 MOTs. Highest fail rate at 17 years old.

How the Grand Voyager RT (5th gen) compares

At each age below, see how the Grand Voyager RT (5th gen) holds up against other cars the same age. The averages combine all fuel types.

Based on 1,001 tests across 2 Chrysler models, built around 2015 (10 years old).

Below typicalAbove typicalHigh (28% or more)Highest fail rateChrysler average
Age / builtFail rateMOT tests
10 yearsbuilt around 2015
22428.1%
11 yearsbuilt around 2014
54328.5%
12 yearsbuilt around 2013
39028.2%
13 yearsbuilt around 2012
47429.1%
14 yearsbuilt around 2011
47829.7%
15 yearsbuilt around 2010
44430.6%
16 yearsbuilt around 2009
48531.3%
17 yearsbuilt around 2008
40935.4%

Fail rate is the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests. How we count fail rates Build years are worked out from age, so they are approximate. Tests counted are 2025 MOTs.

What to check before viewing

The model's most common MOT issues, turned into things you can ask about or look for.

Brake pads

High priority

Ask when the pads were last replaced and check the warning-light history.

Tyres

Worth checking

Check tread depth across the full width on all four; uneven wear suggests alignment or suspension issues.

Shock absorbers

Worth checking

Bounce-test each corner; check for oily streaks down the strut bodies.

Brakes

Worth checking

Inspect the brakes carefully and ask the seller for repair history.

Lighting

Worth checking

Inspect the lighting carefully and ask the seller for repair history.

Vehicle-specific check

Worth checking

Check the car’s number plate on MOT Wise to see its own MOT history and any recalls for its build years.

Other people carriers to compare

Other people carriers, with each one's figures taken at the same age as the Grand Voyager RT (5th gen).

  1. 1

    Toyota Estima

    Same body type, tested at the same age

    Fail rate
    15.9%
    Fail, no pass in 3 days
    3.6%
    Dangerous
    3.6%

    Lower fail rate: 15.9%, against 28.1% for the Chrysler Grand Voyager RT (5th gen), both built around 2015.

    1,371 MOT tests on cars built around 2015

  2. 2

    Skoda Roomster

    Same body type, tested at the same age

    Fail rate
    19.5%
    Fail, no pass in 3 days
    2.4%
    Dangerous
    4.7%
    Still registered at 10 years
    96.4%

    Lower fail rate: 19.5%, against 28.1% for the Chrysler Grand Voyager RT (5th gen), both built around 2015.

    2,916 MOT tests on cars built around 2015

  3. 3

    Ford B-MAX

    Same body type, tested at the same age

    Fail rate
    23.4%
    Fail, no pass in 3 days
    2.9%
    Dangerous
    4.8%
    Still registered at 10 years
    96.2%

    Lower fail rate: 23.4%, against 28.1% for the Chrysler Grand Voyager RT (5th gen), both built around 2015.

    14,670 MOT tests on cars built around 2015

  4. 4

    Toyota Verso

    Same body type, tested at the same age

    Fail rate
    21.6%
    Fail, no pass in 3 days
    2.8%
    Dangerous
    5.2%
    Still registered at 10 years
    90%

    Lower fail rate: 21.6%, against 28.1% for the Chrysler Grand Voyager RT (5th gen), both built around 2015.

    2 critical recall campaigns matching this model/build period.

    3,821 MOT tests on cars built around 2015

Fail rate
= the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests.
Fail, no pass in 3 days
= the share of MOT tests that failed and still hadn't passed 3 days later. A fail that passed a retest within 3 days, even the same day, isn't counted.
Dangerous
= the share of MOT tests where the tester marked a fault as dangerous. It is against the law to drive the car until it is fixed.
Still registered at 10 years
= the share of cars still registered (taxed or declared off the road) 10 years after they were first registered.

How many are still registered

Not enough registration data to show this for the Chrysler Grand Voyager.

The share still registered can reflect demand, the cost of repairs, exports, write-offs and how owners use the car. It isn't proof of how long the car lasts mechanically.

Recall context

1 recall in all

No recall notices match this build period.

For the exact car, check GOV.UK's recall checker with the number plate.

How Grand Voyager RT (5th gen) cars have aged

How Grand Voyager RT (5th gen) cars have aged

How fail rates have changed as these cars got older. Each line follows cars first registered in about the same year across several years of MOT data. Not a prediction for any one car.

0%10%20%30%7911131517Age at MOTBuilt around 2014, 7 years old at the time of MOT: 28.0% (428 tests, 2021 data)Built around 2014, 8 years old at the time of MOT: 26.7% (401 tests, 2022 data)Built around 2014, 9 years old at the time of MOT: 27.9% (390 tests, 2023 data)Built around 2014, 10 years old at the time of MOT: 26.1% (372 tests, 2024 data)Built around 2014, 11 years old at the time of MOT: 29.1% (388 tests, 2025 data)2014Built around 2013, 8 years old at the time of MOT: 26.1% (284 tests, 2021 data)Built around 2013, 9 years old at the time of MOT: 26.4% (277 tests, 2022 data)Built around 2013, 10 years old at the time of MOT: 28.3% (269 tests, 2023 data)Built around 2013, 11 years old at the time of MOT: 28.5% (256 tests, 2024 data)Built around 2013, 12 years old at the time of MOT: 27.8% (237 tests, 2025 data)2013Built around 2012, 9 years old at the time of MOT: 31.5% (336 tests, 2021 data)Built around 2012, 10 years old at the time of MOT: 24.5% (302 tests, 2022 data)Built around 2012, 11 years old at the time of MOT: 27.3% (289 tests, 2023 data)Built around 2012, 12 years old at the time of MOT: 28.6% (283 tests, 2024 data)Built around 2012, 13 years old at the time of MOT: 26.9% (249 tests, 2025 data)2012Built around 2011, 10 years old at the time of MOT: 26.5% (408 tests, 2021 data)Built around 2011, 11 years old at the time of MOT: 29.2% (401 tests, 2022 data)Built around 2011, 12 years old at the time of MOT: 27.6% (359 tests, 2023 data)Built around 2011, 13 years old at the time of MOT: 30.5% (348 tests, 2024 data)Built around 2011, 14 years old at the time of MOT: 27.6% (286 tests, 2025 data)2011Built around 2010, 11 years old at the time of MOT: 31.8% (362 tests, 2021 data)Built around 2010, 12 years old at the time of MOT: 34.2% (351 tests, 2022 data)Built around 2010, 13 years old at the time of MOT: 30.9% (311 tests, 2023 data)Built around 2010, 14 years old at the time of MOT: 33.2% (286 tests, 2024 data)Built around 2010, 15 years old at the time of MOT: 33.6% (253 tests, 2025 data)2010Built around 2009, 12 years old at the time of MOT: 31.6% (383 tests, 2021 data)Built around 2009, 13 years old at the time of MOT: 31.6% (342 tests, 2022 data)Built around 2009, 14 years old at the time of MOT: 30.5% (266 tests, 2023 data)Built around 2009, 15 years old at the time of MOT: 33.1% (239 tests, 2024 data)Built around 2009, 16 years old at the time of MOT: 32.1% (187 tests, 2025 data)2009Built around 2008, 13 years old at the time of MOT: 31.3% (954 tests, 2021 data)Built around 2008, 14 years old at the time of MOT: 32.5% (835 tests, 2022 data)Built around 2008, 15 years old at the time of MOT: 32.1% (660 tests, 2023 data)Built around 2008, 16 years old at the time of MOT: 32.6% (531 tests, 2024 data)Built around 2008, 17 years old at the time of MOT: 35.5% (409 tests, 2025 data)2008
First registered around 2014First registered around 2013First registered around 2012First registered around 2011
All generations of this modelNot enough data

Most common issues on Chrysler Grand Voyagers of this age

This list covers every Chrysler Grand Voyager built around 2015, whichever generation it is. We don't have a defect list for the RT (5th gen) on its own.

Most common advisories and fails

In order of the share of MOT tests that recorded each one

  1. 1
    Advisory

    Tyre worn close to the legal limit or worn on the edge

    18.3%
    Advisory: 62Fail: 1 (2% of the times it was found)
  2. 2
    Advisory

    Shock absorber has a light misting of oil

    15.6%
    Advisory: 41Fail: 5 (11% of the times it was found)
  3. 3
    Advisory

    Brake pads wearing thin

    14.7%
    Advisory: 34Fail: 3 (8% of the times it was found)
  4. 4
    Minor

    One of the number plate lights not working

    9.8%
    Advisory: 0Fail: 0 (0% of the times it was found)
  5. 5
    Major

    Sidelight or rear light not working

    8.5%
    Advisory: 9Fail: 12 (57% of the times it was found)

Based on 224 tests

Looking at a Chrysler Grand Voyager RT (5th gen) right now?

Enter its number plate to see its full MOT history, risk rating and running costs.

Frequently asked questions

Built around 2015 (10 years old), the Chrysler Grand Voyager RT (5th gen) (2008-2015) fails MOTs noticeably more often than typical for this age. This is based on 224 10-year-old MOT tests from DVSA data. Each retest counts as a test.

*The build year is worked out from the date a car was first used on UK roads. For most cars this matches when it was registered, but imports may differ by a few months.

Data sourced from DVSA MOT History API. From 3,447 MOT tests on Chrysler Grand Voyagers first registered between 2008-2015. These figures are a guide, not a guarantee.