Skip to main content
Check

Chrysler Grand Voyager RS (4th gen) (2001-2007) reliability

At a glance

Chrysler Grand Voyager RS (4th gen) built around 2006: more dangerous faults than average

Testers find a dangerous fault on Chrysler Grand Voyager RS (4th gen) models built around 2006 more often than on similar cars the same age. Look closely at the suspension on any car you view. An independent inspection matters more than the wider numbers on cars this old.

Looking at a Chrysler Grand Voyager RS (4th gen) right now?

Enter its number plate to see its full MOT history, risk rating and running costs.

Key figure

10% of MOT tests on Chrysler Grand Voyager RS (4th gen) models built around 2006 found a fault the tester marked as dangerous, against 8% for similar cars the same age.

Most common issue

The most common MOT issue on Chrysler Grand Voyager RS (4th gen) models built around 2006 involves the suspension.

No reliability rating: not enough tests to rate2001-2007MPVDIESEL / PETROL

Based on 2,647 tests of Grand Voyager models registered 2001-2007.

About 1 in 8 Grand Voyager RS (4th gen) MOTs (13.2%) failed and still hadn't passed 3 days later. That's for cars built around 2006 (19 years old), all fuels combined.

Based on 810 tests (DVSA MOT results, 2025), a small sample, so the figure is likely between 11.1% and 15.7%. A fail that passed a retest within 3 days, even the same day, isn't counted. Nor is a fail with no later MOT on record.

About 1 in 10 Grand Voyager RS (4th gen) MOTs (9.6%) found at least one dangerous defect. These are cars built around 2006 (19 years old).

Based on 810 tests (DVSA MOT results, 2025), a small sample, so the figure is likely between 7.8% and 11.9%. Dangerous is the most serious grade an MOT gives: a direct risk to road safety.

RS (4th gen) fail rate by age

Below typicalAbove typicalHigh (28% or more)Highest fail rateUK average for cars this age
Age / builtFail rateMOT tests
17 yearsbuilt around 2008
27733.6%
18 yearsbuilt around 2007
76332.1%
19 yearsbuilt around 2006
81032.8%
20 yearsbuilt around 2005
45732.6%
21 yearsbuilt around 2004
19130.4%
22 yearsbuilt around 2003
9431.9%
23 yearsbuilt around 2002
5530.9%

Fail rate is the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests. How we count fail rates Build years are worked out from age, so they are approximate. Tests counted are 2025 MOTs. Highest fail rate at 17 years old.

How the Grand Voyager RS (4th gen) compares

At each age below, see how the Grand Voyager RS (4th gen) holds up against other cars the same age. The averages combine all fuel types.

Based on 2,714 tests across 6 Chrysler models, built around 2006 (19 years old).

Below typicalAbove typicalHigh (28% or more)Highest fail rateChrysler average
Age / builtFail rateMOT tests
17 yearsbuilt around 2008
27733.6%
18 yearsbuilt around 2007
76332.1%
19 yearsbuilt around 2006
81032.8%
20 yearsbuilt around 2005
45732.6%
21 yearsbuilt around 2004
19130.4%
22 yearsbuilt around 2003
9431.9%
23 yearsbuilt around 2002
5530.9%

Fail rate is the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests. How we count fail rates Build years are worked out from age, so they are approximate. Tests counted are 2025 MOTs.

What to check before viewing

The model's most common MOT issues, turned into things you can ask about or look for.

Independent inspection

High priority

Have an independent specialist inspect the car before you commit.

Brake discs

High priority

Ask for the date and mileage of the last disc replacement; visually check for a deep wear lip and rust pitting on each disc.

Suspension bushes and joints

Worth checking

Listen for knocks over speed bumps and ask about recent control-arm or anti-roll-bar work.

Tyres

Worth checking

Check tread depth across the full width on all four; uneven wear suggests alignment or suspension issues.

Leaks

Worth checking

Inspect the leaks carefully and ask the seller for repair history.

Vehicle-specific check

Worth checking

Check the car’s number plate on MOT Wise to see its own MOT history and any recalls for its build years.

Other people carriers to compare

Other people carriers, with each one's figures taken at the same age as the Grand Voyager RS (4th gen).

  1. 1

    Toyota Alphard

    Same body type, tested at the same age

    Fail rate
    22.8%
    Fail, no pass in 3 days
    6.8%
    Dangerous
    6.9%

    Lower fail rate: 22.8%, against 32.8% for the Chrysler Grand Voyager RS (4th gen), both built around 2006.

    1,550 MOT tests on cars built around 2006

  2. 2

    Mercedes-Benz B-Class

    Same body type, tested at the same age

    Fail rate
    31.4%
    Fail, no pass in 3 days
    8.5%
    Dangerous
    7.1%

    Fewer fails still not passed 3 days later: 8.5%, against 13.2% for the Chrysler Grand Voyager RS (4th gen).

    6 critical recall campaigns matching this model/build period.

    1,553 MOT tests on cars built around 2006

  3. 3

    Volkswagen Caddy

    Same body type, tested at the same age

    Fail rate
    31.1%
    Fail, no pass in 3 days
    11.4%
    Dangerous
    7.1%
    Still registered at 10 years
    88.8%

    Fewer dangerous faults: 7.1%, against 9.6% for the Chrysler Grand Voyager RS (4th gen).

    2,896 MOT tests on cars built around 2006

  4. 4

    Renault Kangoo

    Same body type, tested at the same age

    Fail rate
    34.6%

    No clear edge over the Chrysler Grand Voyager RS (4th gen) on these figures.

    Some figures could not be compared for these two cars. So this comparison uses the fail rate and recalls only.

    2,982 MOT tests on cars built around 2006

Fail rate
= the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests.
Fail, no pass in 3 days
= the share of MOT tests that failed and still hadn't passed 3 days later. A fail that passed a retest within 3 days, even the same day, isn't counted.
Dangerous
= the share of MOT tests where the tester marked a fault as dangerous. It is against the law to drive the car until it is fixed.
Still registered at 10 years
= the share of cars still registered (taxed or declared off the road) 10 years after they were first registered.

How many are still registered

Not enough registration data to show this for the Chrysler Grand Voyager.

The share still registered can reflect demand, the cost of repairs, exports, write-offs and how owners use the car. It isn't proof of how long the car lasts mechanically.

Recall context

2 recalls in all

Includes recalls GOV.UK files under the Chrysler Voyager, the model this one is based on.

1 of the 2 Grand Voyager RS (4th gen) recalls covers cars built in these years.

  • 1 Critical

Top concerns

  • The upper power steering hose may split and leak.

For the exact car, check GOV.UK's recall checker with the number plate.

What has gone wrong on Grand Voyager RS (4th gen) cars built around 2006

The share of diesel cars that have ever failed an MOT on each part of the car. Based on 228 cars.

Structural systems

Suspension
58%
Steering
30%
Drivetrain
12%
Emissions
12%
Bodywork
8%

Wear items

Brakes
84%
Lighting
72%
Tyres
47%

Rust, which the MOT calls corrosion: 19% of these cars show rust-related issues at this age.

Check the sills, subframe and brake pipes before you decide.

How Grand Voyager RS (4th gen) cars have aged

How Grand Voyager RS (4th gen) cars have aged

How fail rates have changed as these cars got older. Each line follows cars first registered in about the same year across several years of MOT data. Not a prediction for any one car.

0%10%20%30%40%1416182022Age at MOTBuilt around 2007, 14 years old at the time of MOT: 33.0% (980 tests, 2021 data)Built around 2007, 15 years old at the time of MOT: 33.3% (790 tests, 2022 data)Built around 2007, 16 years old at the time of MOT: 33.9% (567 tests, 2023 data)Built around 2007, 17 years old at the time of MOT: 31.2% (430 tests, 2024 data)Built around 2007, 18 years old at the time of MOT: 33.6% (289 tests, 2025 data)2007Built around 2006, 15 years old at the time of MOT: 33.8% (1,437 tests, 2021 data)Built around 2006, 16 years old at the time of MOT: 33.5% (1,121 tests, 2022 data)Built around 2006, 17 years old at the time of MOT: 35.0% (889 tests, 2023 data)Built around 2006, 18 years old at the time of MOT: 29.7% (607 tests, 2024 data)Built around 2006, 19 years old at the time of MOT: 32.9% (511 tests, 2025 data)2006Built around 2005, 16 years old at the time of MOT: 32.9% (1,031 tests, 2021 data)Built around 2005, 17 years old at the time of MOT: 33.5% (843 tests, 2022 data)Built around 2005, 18 years old at the time of MOT: 31.3% (598 tests, 2023 data)Built around 2005, 19 years old at the time of MOT: 31.6% (440 tests, 2024 data)Built around 2005, 20 years old at the time of MOT: 31.7% (347 tests, 2025 data)2005Built around 2004, 17 years old at the time of MOT: 35.3% (515 tests, 2021 data)Built around 2004, 18 years old at the time of MOT: 35.1% (348 tests, 2022 data)Built around 2004, 19 years old at the time of MOT: 34.1% (252 tests, 2023 data)Built around 2004, 20 years old at the time of MOT: 37.4% (163 tests, 2024 data)Built around 2004, 21 years old at the time of MOT: 31.0% (113 tests, 2025 data)2004Built around 2003, 18 years old at the time of MOT: 39.1% (389 tests, 2021 data)Built around 2003, 19 years old at the time of MOT: 37.8% (259 tests, 2022 data)Built around 2003, 20 years old at the time of MOT: 34.9% (166 tests, 2023 data)Built around 2003, 21 years old at the time of MOT: 32.0% (75 tests, 2024 data)Built around 2003, 22 years old at the time of MOT: 30.0% (60 tests, 2025 data)2003Built around 2002, 19 years old at the time of MOT: 36.5% (192 tests, 2021 data)Built around 2002, 20 years old at the time of MOT: 34.3% (108 tests, 2022 data)Built around 2002, 21 years old at the time of MOT: 34.7% (72 tests, 2023 data)2002Built around 2001, 20 years old at the time of MOT: 36.0% (100 tests, 2021 data)Built around 2001, 21 years old at the time of MOT: 33.3% (69 tests, 2022 data)Built around 2001, 22 years old at the time of MOT: 35.1% (57 tests, 2023 data)2001
First registered around 2007First registered around 2006First registered around 2005First registered around 2004
How each part holds up as RS (4th gen) cars age

How each part holds up as RS (4th gen) cars age

The share of diesel cars built 2005-2008 that have ever failed an MOT on each part of the car. Rates usually rise with age, but can dip slightly as cars leave the road.

Part of the car17 years18 years19 years20 years
Suspension52%60%58%59%
Brakes86%80%84%87%
Emissions23%13%12%11%
Tyres50%49%47%56%
Lighting75%65%72%79%
Drivetrain9%4%12%17%
Bodywork9%8%8%8%
Steering6%10%30%31%
Corrosion29%19%19%22%

Based on diesel cars in the 2005-2008 build-year band, from 104 to 228 cars at each age.

All generations of this modelNot much data

Most common issues on Chrysler Grand Voyagers of this age

This list covers every Chrysler Grand Voyager built around 2006, whichever generation it is. We don't have a defect list for the RS (4th gen) on its own.

Most common advisories and fails

In order of the share of MOT tests that recorded each one

  1. 1
    Advisory

    Suspension arm pin or bush worn, but not moving too much

    31.5%
    Advisory: 420Fail: 50 (11% of the times it was found)
  2. 2
    Advisory

    Oil leak, but not excessive

    23.3%
    Advisory: 191Fail: 3 (2% of the times it was found)
  3. 3
    Advisory

    Tyre worn close to the legal limit or worn on the edge

    22.0%
    Advisory: 250Fail: 17 (6% of the times it was found)
  4. 4
    Advisory

    Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened

    15.4%
    Advisory: 166Fail: 6 (3% of the times it was found)
  5. 5
    Advisory

    Tyre slightly damaged, cracking or perishing

    13.3%
    Advisory: 126Fail: 21 (14% of the times it was found)

Based on 810 tests

Looking at a Chrysler Grand Voyager RS (4th gen) right now?

Enter its number plate to see its full MOT history, risk rating and running costs.

Frequently asked questions

Built around 2006 (19 years old), the Chrysler Grand Voyager RS (4th gen) (2001-2007) fails MOTs at about the rate typical for this age. This is based on 810 19-year-old MOT tests from DVSA data. Each retest counts as a test.

*The build year is worked out from the date a car was first used on UK roads. For most cars this matches when it was registered, but imports may differ by a few months.

Data sourced from DVSA MOT History API. From 2,647 MOT tests on Chrysler Grand Voyagers first registered between 2001-2007. These figures are a guide, not a guarantee.