Toyota MR2 W30 (3rd gen) (1999-2007) reliability
Toyota MR2 W30 (3rd gen) built around 2004: about average at the MOT
Toyota MR2 W30 (3rd gen) models built around 2004 fail their MOT about as often as similar cars the same age. An independent inspection matters more than the wider numbers on cars this old.
Looking at a Toyota MR2 W30 (3rd gen) right now?
Enter its number plate to see its full MOT history, risk rating and running costs.
Key figure
26% of MOT tests on Toyota MR2 W30 (3rd gen) models built around 2004 ended in a fail (retests included), against 24% for similar cars the same age.
Most common issue
The most common MOT issue on Toyota MR2 W30 (3rd gen) models built around 2004 involves the suspension.

Based on 8,320 tests of MR2 models registered 1999-2007.
About 1 in 8 MR2 W30 (3rd gen) MOTs (12.5%) failed and still hadn't passed 3 days later. That's for cars built around 2004 (21 years old), all fuels combined.
Based on 1,393 tests (DVSA MOT results, 2025). A fail that passed a retest within 3 days, even the same day, isn't counted. Nor is a fail with no later MOT on record.
About 1 in 20 MR2 W30 (3rd gen) MOTs (5.7%) found at least one dangerous defect. These are cars built around 2004 (21 years old).
Based on 1,393 tests (DVSA MOT results, 2025). Dangerous is the most serious grade an MOT gives: a direct risk to road safety.
W30 (3rd gen) fail rate by age
Fail rate is the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests. How we count fail rates Build years are worked out from age, so they are approximate. Tests counted are 2025 MOTs. Highest fail rate at 24 years old.
How the MR2 W30 (3rd gen) compares
At each age below, see how the MR2 W30 (3rd gen) holds up against other cars the same age. The averages combine all fuel types.
Based on 40,713 tests across 17 Toyota models, built around 2004 (21 years old).
Fail rate is the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests. How we count fail rates Build years are worked out from age, so they are approximate. Tests counted are 2025 MOTs.
What to check before viewing
The model's most common MOT issues, turned into things you can ask about or look for.
Brake discs
High priorityAsk for the date and mileage of the last disc replacement; visually check for a deep wear lip and rust pitting on each disc.
Suspension
Worth checkingInspect the suspension carefully and ask the seller for repair history.
Suspension springs
Worth checkingCheck ride height is even side-to-side and look for cracked or rusted coils.
Tyres
Worth checkingCheck tread depth across the full width on all four; uneven wear suggests alignment or suspension issues.
Suspension bushes and joints
Worth checkingListen for knocks over speed bumps and ask about recent control-arm or anti-roll-bar work.
Vehicle-specific check
Worth checkingCheck the car’s number plate on MOT Wise to see its own MOT history and any recalls for its build years.
Other convertibles to compare
Other convertibles, with each one's figures taken at the same age as the MR2 W30 (3rd gen).
- 1

Mercedes-Benz SL
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 16%
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- 7.2%
- Dangerous
- 4%
- Still registered at 10 years
- 90.5%
Lower fail rate: 16.0%, against 26.2% for the Toyota MR2 W30 (3rd gen), both built around 2004.
2,445 MOT tests on cars built around 2004
- 2

Porsche Boxster
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 21.4%
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- 10.3%
- Dangerous
- 3.9%
- Still registered at 10 years
- 97.9%
Lower fail rate: 21.4%, against 26.2% for the Toyota MR2 W30 (3rd gen), both built around 2004.
2,872 MOT tests on cars built around 2004
- 3

MG TF
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 25.9%
No clear edge over the Toyota MR2 W30 (3rd gen) on these figures.
Some figures could not be compared for these two cars. So this comparison uses the fail rate and recalls only.
3,254 MOT tests on cars built around 2004
- 4

BMW Z4
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 24.2%
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- 9.5%
- Dangerous
- 5.3%
- Still registered at 10 years
- 96%
No clear edge over the Toyota MR2 W30 (3rd gen) on these figures.
4,112 MOT tests on cars built around 2004
- Fail rate
- = the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests.
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- = the share of MOT tests that failed and still hadn't passed 3 days later. A fail that passed a retest within 3 days, even the same day, isn't counted.
- Dangerous
- = the share of MOT tests where the tester marked a fault as dangerous. It is against the law to drive the car until it is fixed.
- Still registered at 10 years
- = the share of cars still registered (taxed or declared off the road) 10 years after they were first registered.
Recall context
1 recall in all1 MR2 W30 (3rd gen) recall covers cars built in these years.
- 1 recall
Top concerns
- Brake fluid may leak
For the exact car, check GOV.UK's recall checker with the number plate.
What has gone wrong on MR2 W30 (3rd gen) cars built around 2004
The share of petrol cars that have ever failed an MOT on each part of the car. Based on 2,474 cars.
Rust, which the MOT calls corrosion: 37% of these cars show rust-related issues at this age.
Check the sills, subframe and brake pipes before you decide.
How MR2 W30 (3rd gen) cars have aged
How MR2 W30 (3rd gen) cars have aged
How fail rates have changed as these cars got older. Each line follows cars first registered in about the same year across several years of MOT data. Not a prediction for any one car.
How each part holds up as W30 (3rd gen) cars age
How each part holds up as W30 (3rd gen) cars age
The share of petrol cars built pre-2005 that have ever failed an MOT on each part of the car. Rates usually rise with age, but can dip slightly as cars leave the road.
| Part of the car | 21 years | 22 years | 23 years | 24 years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suspension | 36% | 38% | 50% | 39% |
| Brakes | 75% | 73% | 81% | 83% |
| Emissions | 31% | 33% | 41% | 44% |
| Tyres | 49% | 49% | 55% | 49% |
| Lighting | 45% | 49% | 66% | 67% |
| Drivetrain | 1% | No figure | 2% | 1% |
| Bodywork | 9% | 8% | 10% | 7% |
| Steering | 15% | 14% | 19% | 22% |
| Corrosion | 21% | 21% | 25% | 19% |
Based on petrol cars in the pre-2005 build-year band, from 198 to 270 cars at each age.
W30 (3rd gen) variants compared
Most common issues on Toyota MR2 models of this age
This list covers every Toyota MR2 built around 2004, whichever generation it is. We don't have a defect list for the W30 (3rd gen) on its own.
Most common advisories and fails
In order of the share of MOT tests that recorded each one
- 113.9%Advisory
Coil spring corroded
- 211.4%Advisory
Oil leak, but not excessive
- 311.3%Advisory
Suspension part corroded, but not seriously weakened
- 410.6%Advisory
Tyre slightly damaged, cracking or perishing
- 510.2%Advisory
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened
Based on 1,393 tests
Looking at a Toyota MR2 W30 (3rd gen) right now?
Enter its number plate to see its full MOT history, risk rating and running costs.
Frequently asked questions
Built around 2004 (21 years old), the Toyota MR2 W30 (3rd gen) (1999-2007) fails MOTs noticeably less often than typical for this age. This is based on 1,393 21-year-old MOT tests from DVSA data. Each retest counts as a test.