Rover 216 R8 (1st gen) (1989-1994) reliability
Rover 216 R8 (1st gen) built before 2000: not enough MOT data yet
We've only seen a handful of Rover 216 R8 (1st gen) models built before 2000 so far. Too few to spot a pattern yet.
Looking at a Rover 216 R8 (1st gen) right now?
Enter its number plate to see its full MOT history, risk rating and running costs.
Key figure
Check a car’s number plate to see its own MOT record, or come back when there’s more MOT history.

Based on 316 tests of 216 models registered 1989-1994.
R8 (1st gen) fail rate by age
Fail rate is the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests. How we count fail rates Build years are worked out from age, so they are approximate. Tests counted are 2025 MOTs. Highest fail rate at 25+ years old.
How the 216 R8 (1st gen) compares
At each age below, see how the 216 R8 (1st gen) holds up against other cars the same age. The averages combine all fuel types.
Based on 15,275 tests across 7 Rover models, built before 2000 (over 25 years old).
Fail rate is the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests. How we count fail rates Build years are worked out from age, so they are approximate. Tests counted are 2025 MOTs.
What to check before viewing
The model's most common MOT issues, turned into things you can ask about or look for.
Brake pipes and hoses
High priorityLook under the car for corrosion or chafing on the rigid brake pipes near the rear axle.
Suspension bushes and joints
Worth checkingListen for knocks over speed bumps and ask about recent control-arm or anti-roll-bar work.
Tyres
Worth checkingCheck tread depth across the full width on all four; uneven wear suggests alignment or suspension issues.
Leaks
Worth checkingInspect the leaks carefully and ask the seller for repair history.
Vehicle-specific check
Worth checkingCheck the car’s number plate on MOT Wise to see its own MOT history and any recalls for its build years.
Other hatchbacks to compare
Other hatchbacks, with each one's figures taken at the same age as the 216 R8 (1st gen).
- 1

Ford Sierra
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 11.5%
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- 6%
- Dangerous
- 1.5%
Lower fail rate: 11.5%, against 23.7% for the Rover 216 R8 (1st gen), both built before 2000.
3,022 MOT tests on cars built before 2000
- 2

Vauxhall Nova
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 15.2%
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- 6.8%
- Dangerous
- 2.2%
Lower fail rate: 15.2%, against 23.7% for the Rover 216 R8 (1st gen), both built before 2000.
1,003 MOT tests on cars built before 2000
- 3

Subaru Impreza
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 19.9%
Lower fail rate: 19.9%, against 23.7% for the Rover 216 R8 (1st gen), both built before 2000.
2 critical recall campaigns matching this model/build period.
2,760 MOT tests on cars built before 2000
- 4

Ford Escort
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 16.8%
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- 9.6%
- Dangerous
- 3.8%
Lower fail rate: 16.8%, against 23.7% for the Rover 216 R8 (1st gen), both built before 2000.
10,088 MOT tests on cars built before 2000
- Fail rate
- = the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests.
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- = the share of MOT tests that failed and still hadn't passed 3 days later. A fail that passed a retest within 3 days, even the same day, isn't counted.
- Dangerous
- = the share of MOT tests where the tester marked a fault as dangerous. It is against the law to drive the car until it is fixed.
Recall context
DVSA's recall list has no recalls filed under the Rover 216 name. For the exact car, check with the maker or GOV.UK's recall checker.
What has gone wrong on 216 R8 (1st gen) cars built before 2000
The share of petrol cars that have ever failed an MOT on each part of the car. Based on 5,434 cars.
Rust, which the MOT calls corrosion: 18% of these cars show rust-related issues at this age.
Check the sills, subframe and brake pipes before you decide.
R8 (1st gen) variants compared
Most common issues on Rover 216 models of this age
This list covers every Rover 216 built before 2000, whichever generation it is. We don't have a defect list for the R8 (1st gen) on its own.
Most common advisories and fails
In order of the share of MOT tests that recorded each one
- 115.7%Advisory
Suspension arm pin or bush worn, but not moving too much
- 214.5%Advisory
Oil leak, but not excessive
- 313.7%Advisory
Tyre slightly damaged, cracking or perishing
- 410.6%Advisory
Exhaust has a minor leak
- 59.4%Advisory
Tyre worn close to the legal limit or worn on the edge
Based on 842 tests
Looking at a Rover 216 R8 (1st gen) right now?
Enter its number plate to see its full MOT history, risk rating and running costs.
Frequently asked questions
Built before 2000 (over 25 years old), the Rover 216 R8 (1st gen) (1989-1994) fails MOTs at about the rate typical for this age. This is based on 316 25+ year old MOT tests from DVSA data. Each retest counts as a test.