Skip to main content

MG 6 Series 1 (2011-2016) reliability

Not enough data

MG 6 Series 1 built around 2016: not enough MOT data yet

We've only seen a handful of MG 6 Series 1 models built around 2016 so far. Too few to spot a pattern yet.

Looking at an MG 6 Series 1?

Enter its number plate to see its full MOT history, risk rating and running costs.

Key figure

Check a car’s number plate to see its own MOT record, or come back when there’s more MOT history.

No reliability rating: not enough tests to rate2011-2016HatchbackPETROL / DIESEL

Based on 2,062 tests of 6 models registered 2011-2016.

Series 1 fail rate by age

Below typicalAbove typicalHigh (28% or more)Highest fail rateUK average for cars this age
Age / builtFail rateMOT tests
8 yearsbuilt around 2017
10927.5%
9 yearsbuilt around 2016
37324.4%
10 yearsbuilt around 2015
45429.5%
11 yearsbuilt around 2014
37128.3%
12 yearsbuilt around 2013
26128.0%
13 yearsbuilt around 2012
41831.8%
14 yearsbuilt around 2011
7628.9%

Fail rate is the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests. How we count fail rates Build years are worked out from age, so they are approximate. Tests counted are 2025 MOTs. Highest fail rate at 13 years old.

How the 6 Series 1 compares

At each age below, see how the 6 Series 1 holds up against other cars the same age. The averages combine all fuel types.

Based on 4,400 tests across 3 MG models, built around 2016 (9 years old).

Below typicalAbove typicalHigh (28% or more)Highest fail rateMG average
Age / builtFail rateMOT tests
8 yearsbuilt around 2017
10927.5%
9 yearsbuilt around 2016
37324.4%
10 yearsbuilt around 2015
45429.5%
11 yearsbuilt around 2014
37128.3%
12 yearsbuilt around 2013
26128.0%
13 yearsbuilt around 2012
41831.8%
14 yearsbuilt around 2011
7628.9%

Fail rate is the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests. How we count fail rates Build years are worked out from age, so they are approximate. Tests counted are 2025 MOTs.

What to check before viewing

The model's most common MOT issues, turned into things you can ask about or look for.

Independent inspection

High priority

Have an independent specialist inspect the car before you commit.

Brake pipes and hoses

High priority

Look under the car for corrosion or chafing on the rigid brake pipes near the rear axle.

Brake pads

High priority

Ask when the pads were last replaced and check the warning-light history.

Brake discs

High priority

Ask for the date and mileage of the last disc replacement; visually check for a deep wear lip and rust pitting on each disc.

Tyres

Worth checking

Check tread depth across the full width on all four; uneven wear suggests alignment or suspension issues.

Suspension springs

Worth checking

Check ride height is even side-to-side and look for cracked or rusted coils.

Vehicle-specific check

Worth checking

Check the car’s number plate on MOT Wise to see its own MOT history and any recalls for its build years.

Other hatchbacks to compare

Other hatchbacks, with each one's figures taken at the same age as the 6 Series 1.

  1. 1

    Lexus CT

    Same body type, tested at the same age

    Fail rate
    13.4%
    Fail, no pass in 3 days
    1.5%
    Dangerous
    4.3%
    Still registered at 10 years
    88.2%

    Lower fail rate: 13.4%, against 24.4% for the MG 6 Series 1, both built around 2016.

    3,562 MOT tests on cars built around 2016

  2. 2

    Volkswagen Golf

    Same body type, tested at the same age

    Fail rate
    14.5%
    Fail, no pass in 3 days
    2%
    Dangerous
    4.8%
    Still registered at 10 years
    91.9%

    Lower fail rate: 14.5%, against 24.4% for the MG 6 Series 1, both built around 2016.

    10 critical recall campaigns matching this model/build period.

    78,317 MOT tests on cars built around 2016

  3. 3

    Audi A7

    Same body type, tested at the same age

    Fail rate
    13.7%
    Fail, no pass in 3 days
    3.3%
    Dangerous
    5.6%
    Still registered at 10 years
    84.3%

    Lower fail rate: 13.7%, against 24.4% for the MG 6 Series 1, both built around 2016.

    2,532 MOT tests on cars built around 2016

  4. 4

    Toyota Prius

    Same body type, tested at the same age

    Fail rate
    16.5%
    Fail, no pass in 3 days
    1%
    Dangerous
    4.1%
    Still registered at 10 years
    94.4%

    Lower fail rate: 16.5%, against 24.4% for the MG 6 Series 1, both built around 2016.

    5 critical recall campaigns matching this model/build period.

    19,041 MOT tests on cars built around 2016

Fail rate
= the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests.
Fail, no pass in 3 days
= the share of MOT tests that failed and still hadn't passed 3 days later. A fail that passed a retest within 3 days, even the same day, isn't counted.
Dangerous
= the share of MOT tests where the tester marked a fault as dangerous. It is against the law to drive the car until it is fixed.
Still registered at 10 years
= the share of cars still registered (taxed or declared off the road) 10 years after they were first registered.

How many are still registered

70%of all MG 6 cars first registered in 2014 to 2015 were still registered 10 years later. This is the whole model, not only this generation.

UK average for cars first registered in 2014 to 2015: 92% · Fewer than typical

The share still registered can reflect demand, the cost of repairs, exports, write-offs and how owners use the car. It isn't proof of how long the car lasts mechanically.

Source: DfT vehicle licensing statistics (VEH0124).

Recall context

DVSA's recall list has no recalls filed under the MG 6 name. For the exact car, check with the maker or GOV.UK's recall checker.

How 6 Series 1 cars have aged

How 6 Series 1 cars have aged

How fail rates have changed as these cars got older. Each line follows cars first registered in about the same year across several years of MOT data. Not a prediction for any one car.

0%10%20%30%5791113Age at MOTBuilt around 2016, 5 years old at the time of MOT: 19.9% (306 tests, 2021 data)Built around 2016, 6 years old at the time of MOT: 22.3% (305 tests, 2022 data)Built around 2016, 7 years old at the time of MOT: 26.7% (300 tests, 2023 data)Built around 2016, 8 years old at the time of MOT: 24.6% (272 tests, 2024 data)Built around 2016, 9 years old at the time of MOT: 22.8% (241 tests, 2025 data)2016Built around 2015, 6 years old at the time of MOT: 24.8% (439 tests, 2021 data)Built around 2015, 7 years old at the time of MOT: 27.6% (427 tests, 2022 data)Built around 2015, 8 years old at the time of MOT: 28.0% (396 tests, 2023 data)Built around 2015, 9 years old at the time of MOT: 27.7% (358 tests, 2024 data)Built around 2015, 10 years old at the time of MOT: 28.0% (293 tests, 2025 data)2015Built around 2014, 7 years old at the time of MOT: 25.7% (405 tests, 2021 data)Built around 2014, 8 years old at the time of MOT: 26.8% (385 tests, 2022 data)Built around 2014, 9 years old at the time of MOT: 31.3% (364 tests, 2023 data)Built around 2014, 10 years old at the time of MOT: 28.5% (312 tests, 2024 data)Built around 2014, 11 years old at the time of MOT: 28.4% (271 tests, 2025 data)2014Built around 2013, 8 years old at the time of MOT: 29.9% (157 tests, 2021 data)Built around 2013, 9 years old at the time of MOT: 28.3% (152 tests, 2022 data)Built around 2013, 10 years old at the time of MOT: 29.3% (150 tests, 2023 data)Built around 2013, 11 years old at the time of MOT: 29.1% (117 tests, 2024 data)Built around 2013, 12 years old at the time of MOT: 23.7% (97 tests, 2025 data)2013Built around 2012, 9 years old at the time of MOT: 27.4% (602 tests, 2021 data)Built around 2012, 10 years old at the time of MOT: 30.9% (569 tests, 2022 data)Built around 2012, 11 years old at the time of MOT: 32.7% (490 tests, 2023 data)Built around 2012, 12 years old at the time of MOT: 30.5% (380 tests, 2024 data)Built around 2012, 13 years old at the time of MOT: 31.6% (304 tests, 2025 data)2012Built around 2011, 10 years old at the time of MOT: 33.5% (155 tests, 2021 data)Built around 2011, 11 years old at the time of MOT: 30.2% (139 tests, 2022 data)Built around 2011, 12 years old at the time of MOT: 34.1% (132 tests, 2023 data)Built around 2011, 13 years old at the time of MOT: 26.6% (94 tests, 2024 data)Built around 2011, 14 years old at the time of MOT: 28.9% (76 tests, 2025 data)2011
First registered around 2016First registered around 2015First registered around 2014First registered around 2013
Series 1 variants compared
All generations of this modelNot enough data

Most common issues on MG 6 models of this age

This list covers every MG 6 built around 2016, whichever generation it is. We don't have a defect list for the Series 1 on its own.

Most common advisories and fails

In order of the share of MOT tests that recorded each one

  1. 1
    Advisory

    Tyre worn close to the legal limit or worn on the edge

    24.9%
    Advisory: 140Fail: 16 (10% of the times it was found)
  2. 2
    Advisory

    Brake pads wearing thin

    20.1%
    Advisory: 77Fail: 12 (13% of the times it was found)
  3. 3
    Advisory

    Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened

    16.1%
    Advisory: 83Fail: 4 (5% of the times it was found)
  4. 4
    Advisory

    Brake pipe corroded or covered in grease

    13.4%
    Advisory: 74Fail: 15 (17% of the times it was found)
  5. 5
    Advisory

    Suspension arm pin or bush worn, but not moving too much

    12.3%
    Advisory: 54Fail: 10 (16% of the times it was found)

Based on 373 tests

Looking at an MG 6 Series 1?

Enter its number plate to see its full MOT history, risk rating and running costs.

Frequently asked questions

Built around 2016 (9 years old), the MG 6 Series 1 (2011-2016) fails MOTs noticeably more often than typical for this age. This is based on 373 9-year-old MOT tests from DVSA data. Each retest counts as a test.

*The build year is worked out from the date a car was first used on UK roads. For most cars this matches when it was registered, but imports may differ by a few months.

Data sourced from DVSA MOT History API. From 2,062 MOT tests on MG 6 models first registered between 2011-2016. These figures are a guide, not a guarantee.