Mercedes-Benz GL X164 (1st gen) (2006-2012) reliability
Mercedes-Benz GL X164 (1st gen) built around 2012: not enough MOT data yet
We've only seen a handful of Mercedes-Benz GL X164 (1st gen) models built around 2012 so far. Too few to spot a pattern yet.
Looking at a Mercedes-Benz GL X164 (1st gen) right now?
Enter its number plate to see its full MOT history, risk rating and running costs.
Key figure
Check a car’s number plate to see its own MOT record, or come back when there’s more MOT history.

Based on 1,509 tests of GL models registered 2006-2012.
X164 (1st gen) fail rate by age
Fail rate is the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests. How we count fail rates Build years are worked out from age, so they are approximate. Tests counted are 2025 MOTs. Highest fail rate at 17 years old.
How the GL X164 (1st gen) compares
At each age below, see how the GL X164 (1st gen) holds up against other cars the same age. The averages combine all fuel types.
Based on 73,176 tests across 16 Mercedes-Benz models, built around 2012 (13 years old).
Fail rate is the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests. How we count fail rates Build years are worked out from age, so they are approximate. Tests counted are 2025 MOTs.
What to check before viewing
The model's most common MOT issues, turned into things you can ask about or look for.
Brake pipes and hoses
High priorityLook under the car for corrosion or chafing on the rigid brake pipes near the rear axle.
Brake discs
High priorityAsk for the date and mileage of the last disc replacement; visually check for a deep wear lip and rust pitting on each disc.
Brake pads
High priorityAsk when the pads were last replaced and check the warning-light history.
Tyres
Worth checkingCheck tread depth across the full width on all four; uneven wear suggests alignment or suspension issues.
Leaks
Worth checkingInspect the leaks carefully and ask the seller for repair history.
Vehicle-specific check
Worth checkingCheck the car’s number plate on MOT Wise to see its own MOT history and any recalls for its build years.
Other SUVs to compare
Other SUVs, with each one's figures taken at the same age as the GL X164 (1st gen).
- 1

Mini (R60)
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 23%
No clear edge over the Mercedes-Benz GL X164 (1st gen) on these figures.
Some figures could not be compared for these two cars. So this comparison uses the fail rate and recalls only.
7,400 MOT tests on cars built around 2012
- 2

Lexus RX
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 19.9%
No clear edge over the Mercedes-Benz GL X164 (1st gen) on these figures.
Some figures could not be compared for these two cars. So this comparison uses the fail rate and recalls only.
1,819 MOT tests on cars built around 2012
- 3

Toyota RAV4
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 23.6%
No clear edge over the Mercedes-Benz GL X164 (1st gen) on these figures.
7 critical recall campaigns matching this model/build period.
3,478 MOT tests on cars built around 2012
- 4

Land Rover Discovery
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 22.3%
- Still registered at 10 years
- 91.1%
No clear edge over the Mercedes-Benz GL X164 (1st gen) on these figures.
10 critical recall campaigns matching this model/build period.
7,774 MOT tests on cars built around 2012
- Fail rate
- = the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests.
- Still registered at 10 years
- = the share of cars still registered (taxed or declared off the road) 10 years after they were first registered.
How many are still registered
UK average for cars first registered in 2014 to 2015: 92% · About typical
The share still registered can reflect demand, the cost of repairs, exports, write-offs and how owners use the car. It isn't proof of how long the car lasts mechanically.
Source: DfT vehicle licensing statistics (VEH0124).
Recall context
16 recalls in all3 of the 16 GL X164 (1st gen) recalls cover cars built in these years.
- 1 Critical
- 2 more
Top concerns
- Oil foam may develop in the active curve system oil reservoir
- On affected vehicles the aluminium bolts of the steering gear could corrode and break due to the intrusion of moisture.
- The function of the brake booster might be affected due to advanced corrosion in the joint area of its housing.
For the exact car, check GOV.UK's recall checker with the number plate.
How GL X164 (1st gen) cars have aged
How GL X164 (1st gen) cars have aged
How fail rates have changed as these cars got older. Each line follows cars first registered in about the same year across several years of MOT data. Not a prediction for any one car.
Some lines cover only a year or two, so read this as a rough guide.
X164 (1st gen) variants compared
Most common issues on Mercedes-Benz GL models of this age
This list covers every Mercedes-Benz GL built around 2012, whichever generation it is. We don't have a defect list for the X164 (1st gen) on its own.
Most common advisories and fails
In order of the share of MOT tests that recorded each one
- 122.9%Advisory
Oil leak, but not excessive
- 217.9%Advisory
Tyre worn close to the legal limit or worn on the edge
- 313.3%Advisory
Brake pipe corroded or covered in grease
- 48.8%Advisory
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened
- 57.5%Advisory
Brake pads wearing thin
Based on 240 tests
Looking at a Mercedes-Benz GL X164 (1st gen) right now?
Enter its number plate to see its full MOT history, risk rating and running costs.
Frequently asked questions
Built around 2012 (13 years old), the Mercedes-Benz GL X164 (1st gen) (2006-2012) fails MOTs noticeably less often than typical for this age. This is based on 240 13-year-old MOT tests from DVSA data. Each retest counts as a test.