Hyundai Tucson Mk1 (JM) (2004-2009) reliability
Hyundai Tucson Mk1 (JM) built around 2006: more dangerous faults than average
Testers find a dangerous fault on Hyundai Tucson Mk1 (JM) models built around 2006 more often than on similar cars the same age. Look closely at the suspension on any car you view. An independent inspection matters more than the wider numbers on cars this old.
Looking at a Hyundai Tucson Mk1 (JM) right now?
Enter its number plate to see its full MOT history, risk rating and running costs.
Key figure
11% of MOT tests on Hyundai Tucson Mk1 (JM) models built around 2006 found a fault the tester marked as dangerous, against 7% for similar cars the same age.
Most common issue
The most common MOT issue on Hyundai Tucson Mk1 (JM) models built around 2006 involves the suspension.

Based on 4,662 tests of Tucson models registered 2004-2009.
About 1 in 9 Tucson Mk1 (JM) MOTs (11.5%) failed and still hadn't passed 3 days later. That's for cars built around 2006 (19 years old), all fuels combined.
Based on 1,250 tests (DVSA MOT results, 2025). A fail that passed a retest within 3 days, even the same day, isn't counted. Nor is a fail with no later MOT on record.
About 1 in 9 Tucson Mk1 (JM) MOTs (11.4%) found at least one dangerous defect. These are cars built around 2006 (19 years old).
Based on 1,250 tests (DVSA MOT results, 2025). Dangerous is the most serious grade an MOT gives: a direct risk to road safety.
Mk1 (JM) fail rate by age
Fail rate is the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests. How we count fail rates Build years are worked out from age, so they are approximate. Tests counted are 2025 MOTs. Highest fail rate at 19 years old.
How the Tucson Mk1 (JM) compares
At each age below, see how the Tucson Mk1 (JM) holds up against other cars the same age. The averages combine all fuel types.
Based on 9,542 tests across 8 Hyundai models, built around 2006 (19 years old).
Fail rate is the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests. How we count fail rates Build years are worked out from age, so they are approximate. Tests counted are 2025 MOTs.
What to check before viewing
The model's most common MOT issues, turned into things you can ask about or look for.
Independent inspection
High priorityHave an independent specialist inspect the car before you commit.
Brake pipes and hoses
High priorityLook under the car for corrosion or chafing on the rigid brake pipes near the rear axle.
Suspension bushes and joints
Worth checkingListen for knocks over speed bumps and ask about recent control-arm or anti-roll-bar work.
Tyres
Worth checkingCheck tread depth across the full width on all four; uneven wear suggests alignment or suspension issues.
Suspension
Worth checkingInspect the suspension carefully and ask the seller for repair history.
Leaks
Worth checkingInspect the leaks carefully and ask the seller for repair history.
Vehicle-specific check
Worth checkingCheck the car’s number plate on MOT Wise to see its own MOT history and any recalls for its build years.
Other SUVs to compare
Other SUVs, with each one's figures taken at the same age as the Tucson Mk1 (JM).
- 1

Porsche Cayenne
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 21.7%
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- 7.7%
- Dangerous
- 4.9%
- Still registered at 10 years
- 84.8%
Lower fail rate: 21.7%, against 34.7% for the Hyundai Tucson Mk1 (JM), both built around 2006.
1,231 MOT tests on cars built around 2006
- 2

Land Rover Defender
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 26%
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- 10.7%
- Dangerous
- 5.1%
Lower fail rate: 26.0%, against 34.7% for the Hyundai Tucson Mk1 (JM), both built around 2006.
6 critical recall campaigns matching this model/build period.
5,369 MOT tests on cars built around 2006
- 3

Lexus RX
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 26.4%
Lower fail rate: 26.4%, against 34.7% for the Hyundai Tucson Mk1 (JM), both built around 2006.
Some figures could not be compared for these two cars. So this comparison uses the fail rate and recalls only.
1,442 MOT tests on cars built around 2006
- 4

BMW X3
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 28.2%
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- 9%
- Dangerous
- 6.4%
- Still registered at 10 years
- 93.6%
Lower fail rate: 28.1%, against 34.7% for the Hyundai Tucson Mk1 (JM), both built around 2006.
10 critical recall campaigns matching this model/build period.
2,867 MOT tests on cars built around 2006
- Fail rate
- = the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests.
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- = the share of MOT tests that failed and still hadn't passed 3 days later. A fail that passed a retest within 3 days, even the same day, isn't counted.
- Dangerous
- = the share of MOT tests where the tester marked a fault as dangerous. It is against the law to drive the car until it is fixed.
- Still registered at 10 years
- = the share of cars still registered (taxed or declared off the road) 10 years after they were first registered.
How many are still registered
UK average for cars first registered in 2014 to 2015: 92% · About typical
The share still registered can reflect demand, the cost of repairs, exports, write-offs and how owners use the car. It isn't proof of how long the car lasts mechanically.
Source: DfT vehicle licensing statistics (VEH0124).
Recall context
17 recalls in all2 of the 17 Tucson Mk1 (JM) recalls cover cars built in these years.
- 2 recalls
Top concerns
- Brake lights may malfunction
- Parking brake may not engage
For the exact car, check GOV.UK's recall checker with the number plate.
What has gone wrong on Tucson Mk1 (JM) cars built around 2006
The share of diesel cars that have ever failed an MOT on each part of the car. Based on 244 cars.
Rust, which the MOT calls corrosion: 22% of these cars show rust-related issues at this age.
Check the sills, subframe and brake pipes before you decide.
How Tucson Mk1 (JM) cars have aged
How Tucson Mk1 (JM) cars have aged
How fail rates have changed as these cars got older. Each line follows cars first registered in about the same year across several years of MOT data. Not a prediction for any one car.
How each part holds up as Mk1 (JM) cars age
How each part holds up as Mk1 (JM) cars age
The share of diesel cars built 2005-2008 that have ever failed an MOT on each part of the car. Rates usually rise with age, but can dip slightly as cars leave the road.
| Part of the car | 17 years | 18 years | 19 years | 20 years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suspension | 69% | 69% | 72% | 74% |
| Brakes | 54% | 67% | 61% | 68% |
| Emissions | 22% | 18% | 23% | 19% |
| Tyres | 42% | 35% | 40% | 36% |
| Lighting | 51% | 54% | 61% | 65% |
| Drivetrain | No figure | 4% | 6% | 6% |
| Bodywork | 14% | 16% | 14% | 13% |
| Steering | 8% | 9% | 10% | 8% |
| Corrosion | 33% | 37% | 22% | 29% |
Based on diesel cars in the 2005-2008 build-year band, from 83 to 265 cars at each age.
Mk1 (JM) variants compared
Tucson Mk1 (JM) variants built around 2006
The fail rate for each Tucson Mk1 (JM) variant, grouped by fuel. Each row counts fails per MOT test, the same way as the main fail rate chart.
Diesel
- TUCSON33.9%840 tests
Petrol
- TUCSON36.3%410 tests
Most common issues on Hyundai Tucsons of this age
This list covers every Hyundai Tucson built around 2006, whichever generation it is. We don't have a defect list for the Mk1 (JM) on its own.
Most common advisories and fails
In order of the share of MOT tests that recorded each one
- 129.6%Advisory
Suspension arm pin or bush worn, but not moving too much
- 225.8%Advisory
Tyre worn close to the legal limit or worn on the edge
- 322.8%Advisory
Oil leak, but not excessive
- 419.6%Advisory
Suspension part corroded, but not seriously weakened
- 516.5%Advisory
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened
Based on 1,250 tests
Looking at a Hyundai Tucson Mk1 (JM) right now?
Enter its number plate to see its full MOT history, risk rating and running costs.
Frequently asked questions
Built around 2006 (19 years old), the Hyundai Tucson Mk1 (JM) (2004-2009) fails MOTs noticeably more often than typical for this age. This is based on 1,250 19-year-old MOT tests from DVSA data. Each retest counts as a test.