Honda Stepwagon RG1–4 (3rd gen) (2005-2009) reliability
Honda Stepwagon RG1–4 (3rd gen) built around 2009: not enough MOT data yet
We've only seen a handful of Honda Stepwagon RG1–4 (3rd gen) models built around 2009 so far. Too few to spot a pattern yet.
Looking at a Honda Stepwagon RG1–4 (3rd gen) right now?
Enter its number plate to see its full MOT history, risk rating and running costs.
Key figure
Check a car’s number plate to see its own MOT record, or come back when there’s more MOT history.

Based on 1,057 tests of Stepwagon models registered 2005-2009.
RG1–4 (3rd gen) fail rate by age
Fail rate is the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests. How we count fail rates Build years are worked out from age, so they are approximate. Tests counted are 2025 MOTs. Highest fail rate at 19 years old.
How the Stepwagon RG1–4 (3rd gen) compares
At each age below, see how the Stepwagon RG1–4 (3rd gen) holds up against other cars the same age. The averages combine all fuel types.
Based on 71,090 tests across 9 Honda models, built around 2009 (16 years old).
Fail rate is the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests. How we count fail rates Build years are worked out from age, so they are approximate. Tests counted are 2025 MOTs.
What to check before viewing
The model's most common MOT issues, turned into things you can ask about or look for.
Brake pads
High priorityAsk when the pads were last replaced and check the warning-light history.
Suspension bushes and joints
Worth checkingListen for knocks over speed bumps and ask about recent control-arm or anti-roll-bar work.
Tyres
Worth checkingCheck tread depth across the full width on all four; uneven wear suggests alignment or suspension issues.
Lighting
Worth checkingInspect the lighting carefully and ask the seller for repair history.
Vehicle-specific check
Worth checkingCheck the car’s number plate on MOT Wise to see its own MOT history and any recalls for its build years.
Other people carriers to compare
Other people carriers, with each one's figures taken at the same age as the Stepwagon RG1–4 (3rd gen).
- 1

Toyota Estima
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 20.2%
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- 4.1%
- Dangerous
- 4.1%
Fewer fails still not passed 3 days later: 4.1%, against 8.7% for the Honda Stepwagon RG1–4 (3rd gen).
1,839 MOT tests on cars built around 2009
- 2

Toyota Verso
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 27.6%
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- 5.3%
- Dangerous
- 5.4%
- Still registered at 10 years
- 90%
Fewer fails still not passed 3 days later: 5.3%, against 8.7% for the Honda Stepwagon RG1–4 (3rd gen).
2 critical recall campaigns matching this model/build period.
1,142 MOT tests on cars built around 2009
- 3

Skoda Roomster
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 33.7%
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- 7.3%
- Dangerous
- 7.3%
- Still registered at 10 years
- 96.4%
No clear edge over the Honda Stepwagon RG1–4 (3rd gen) on these figures.
2,120 MOT tests on cars built around 2009
- 4

Ford C-MAX
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 32.5%
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- 7%
- Dangerous
- 10.2%
- Still registered at 10 years
- 94.9%
No clear edge over the Honda Stepwagon RG1–4 (3rd gen) on these figures.
7 critical recall campaigns matching this model/build period.
9,059 MOT tests on cars built around 2009
- Fail rate
- = the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests.
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- = the share of MOT tests that failed and still hadn't passed 3 days later. A fail that passed a retest within 3 days, even the same day, isn't counted.
- Dangerous
- = the share of MOT tests where the tester marked a fault as dangerous. It is against the law to drive the car until it is fixed.
- Still registered at 10 years
- = the share of cars still registered (taxed or declared off the road) 10 years after they were first registered.
Recall context
DVSA's recall list has no recalls filed under the Honda Stepwagon name. For the exact car, check with the maker or GOV.UK's recall checker.
How Stepwagon RG1–4 (3rd gen) cars have aged
How Stepwagon RG1–4 (3rd gen) cars have aged
How fail rates have changed as these cars got older. Each line follows cars first registered in about the same year across several years of MOT data. Not a prediction for any one car.
RG1–4 (3rd gen) variants compared
Most common issues on Honda Stepwagons of this age
This list covers every Honda Stepwagon built around 2009, whichever generation it is. We don't have a defect list for the RG1–4 (3rd gen) on its own.
Most common advisories and fails
In order of the share of MOT tests that recorded each one
- 121.4%Advisory
Suspension arm pin or bush worn, but not moving too much
- 217.1%Advisory
Tyre worn close to the legal limit or worn on the edge
- 314.4%Advisory
Brake pads wearing thin
- 410.0%Advisory
Oil leak, but not excessive
- 59.4%Advisory
Headlamp lens partly covered, but light output not badly reduced
Based on 299 tests
Looking at a Honda Stepwagon RG1–4 (3rd gen) right now?
Enter its number plate to see its full MOT history, risk rating and running costs.
Frequently asked questions
Built around 2009 (16 years old), the Honda Stepwagon RG1–4 (3rd gen) (2005-2009) fails MOTs noticeably less often than typical for this age. This is based on 299 16-year-old MOT tests from DVSA data. Each retest counts as a test.