Chrysler Voyager RS (4th gen) (2001-2007) reliability
Chrysler Voyager RS (4th gen) built around 2006: not enough MOT data yet
We've only seen a handful of Chrysler Voyager RS (4th gen) models built around 2006 so far. Too few to spot a pattern yet.
Looking at a Chrysler Voyager RS (4th gen) right now?
Enter its number plate to see its full MOT history, risk rating and running costs.
Key figure
Check a car’s number plate to see its own MOT record, or come back when there’s more MOT history.

Based on 429 tests of Voyager models registered 2001-2007.
RS (4th gen) fail rate by age
Fail rate is the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests. How we count fail rates Build years are worked out from age, so they are approximate. Tests counted are 2025 MOTs. Highest fail rate at 19 years old.
How the Voyager RS (4th gen) compares
At each age below, see how the Voyager RS (4th gen) holds up against other cars the same age. The averages combine all fuel types.
Based on 2,714 tests across 6 Chrysler models, built around 2006 (19 years old).
Fail rate is the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests. How we count fail rates Build years are worked out from age, so they are approximate. Tests counted are 2025 MOTs.
What to check before viewing
The model's most common MOT issues, turned into things you can ask about or look for.
Brake pipes and hoses
High priorityLook under the car for corrosion or chafing on the rigid brake pipes near the rear axle.
Suspension bushes and joints
Worth checkingListen for knocks over speed bumps and ask about recent control-arm or anti-roll-bar work.
Tyres
Worth checkingCheck tread depth across the full width on all four; uneven wear suggests alignment or suspension issues.
Suspension
Worth checkingInspect the suspension carefully and ask the seller for repair history.
Shock absorbers
Worth checkingBounce-test each corner; check for oily streaks down the strut bodies.
Vehicle-specific check
Worth checkingCheck the car’s number plate on MOT Wise to see its own MOT history and any recalls for its build years.
Other people carriers to compare
Other people carriers, with each one's figures taken at the same age as the Voyager RS (4th gen).
- 1

Toyota Alphard
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 22.8%
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- 6.8%
- Dangerous
- 6.9%
Lower fail rate: 22.8%, against 39.5% for the Chrysler Voyager RS (4th gen), both built around 2006.
1,550 MOT tests on cars built around 2006
- 2

Mercedes-Benz B-Class
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 31.4%
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- 8.5%
- Dangerous
- 7.1%
Lower fail rate: 31.4%, against 39.5% for the Chrysler Voyager RS (4th gen), both built around 2006.
6 critical recall campaigns matching this model/build period.
1,553 MOT tests on cars built around 2006
- 3

Volkswagen Caddy
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 31.1%
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- 11.4%
- Dangerous
- 7.1%
- Still registered at 10 years
- 88.8%
Lower fail rate: 31.1%, against 39.5% for the Chrysler Voyager RS (4th gen), both built around 2006.
2,896 MOT tests on cars built around 2006
- 4

Nissan Elgrand
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 27.5%
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- 12.7%
- Dangerous
- 9.2%
Lower fail rate: 27.5%, against 39.5% for the Chrysler Voyager RS (4th gen), both built around 2006.
1,864 MOT tests on cars built around 2006
- Fail rate
- = the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests.
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- = the share of MOT tests that failed and still hadn't passed 3 days later. A fail that passed a retest within 3 days, even the same day, isn't counted.
- Dangerous
- = the share of MOT tests where the tester marked a fault as dangerous. It is against the law to drive the car until it is fixed.
- Still registered at 10 years
- = the share of cars still registered (taxed or declared off the road) 10 years after they were first registered.
Recall context
7 recalls in all1 of the 7 Voyager RS (4th gen) recalls covers cars built in these years.
- 1 Critical
Top concerns
- The upper power steering hose may split and leak.
For the exact car, check GOV.UK's recall checker with the number plate.
How Voyager RS (4th gen) cars have aged
How Voyager RS (4th gen) cars have aged
How fail rates have changed as these cars got older. Each line follows cars first registered in about the same year across several years of MOT data. Not a prediction for any one car.
Some lines cover only a year or two, so read this as a rough guide.
Most common issues on Chrysler Voyagers of this age
This list covers every Chrysler Voyager built around 2006, whichever generation it is. We don't have a defect list for the RS (4th gen) on its own.
Most common advisories and fails
In order of the share of MOT tests that recorded each one
- 138.8%Advisory
Suspension arm pin or bush worn, but not moving too much
- 235.4%Advisory
Brake pipe corroded or covered in grease
- 323.1%Advisory
Tyre worn close to the legal limit or worn on the edge
- 416.3%Advisory
Suspension mounting area corroded, but not seriously
- 516.3%Advisory
Shock absorber has a light misting of oil
Based on 147 tests
Looking at a Chrysler Voyager RS (4th gen) right now?
Enter its number plate to see its full MOT history, risk rating and running costs.
Frequently asked questions
Built around 2006 (19 years old), the Chrysler Voyager RS (4th gen) (2001-2007) fails MOTs noticeably more often than typical for this age. This is based on 147 19-year-old MOT tests from DVSA data. Each retest counts as a test.