Chevrolet Spark M300 (2010-2015) reliability
Chevrolet Spark M300 built around 2015: not enough MOT data yet
We've only seen a handful of Chevrolet Spark M300 models built around 2015 so far. Too few to spot a pattern yet.
Looking at a Chevrolet Spark M300?
Enter its number plate to see its full MOT history, risk rating and running costs.
Key figure
Check a car’s number plate to see its own MOT record, or come back when there’s more MOT history.

Based on 18,983 tests of Spark models registered 2010-2015.
M300 fail rate by age
Fail rate is the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests. How we count fail rates Build years are worked out from age, so they are approximate. Tests counted are 2025 MOTs. Highest fail rate at 13 years old.
How the Spark M300 compares
At each age below, see how the Spark M300 holds up against other cars the same age. The averages combine all fuel types.
Based on 405 tests across 3 Chevrolet models, built around 2015 (10 years old).
Fail rate is the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests. How we count fail rates Build years are worked out from age, so they are approximate. Tests counted are 2025 MOTs.
What to check before viewing
The model's most common MOT issues, turned into things you can ask about or look for.
Independent inspection
High priorityHave an independent specialist inspect the car before you commit.
Brake pipes and hoses
High priorityLook under the car for corrosion or chafing on the rigid brake pipes near the rear axle.
Suspension bushes and joints
Worth checkingListen for knocks over speed bumps and ask about recent control-arm or anti-roll-bar work.
Tyres
Worth checkingCheck tread depth across the full width on all four; uneven wear suggests alignment or suspension issues.
Brakes
Worth checkingInspect the brakes carefully and ask the seller for repair history.
Vehicle-specific check
Worth checkingCheck the car’s number plate on MOT Wise to see its own MOT history and any recalls for its build years.
Other hatchbacks to compare
Other hatchbacks, with each one's figures taken at the same age as the Spark M300.
- 1

Suzuki Celerio
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 17.1%
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- 2.4%
- Dangerous
- 4.3%
- Still registered at 10 years
- 93.5%
Lower fail rate: 17.1%, against 30.0% for the Chevrolet Spark M300, both built around 2015.
5,173 MOT tests on cars built around 2015
- 2

Skoda Citigo
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 19.1%
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- 2.7%
- Dangerous
- 3.8%
- Still registered at 10 years
- 96.2%
Lower fail rate: 19.1%, against 30.0% for the Chevrolet Spark M300, both built around 2015.
10,283 MOT tests on cars built around 2015
- 3

Toyota Aygo
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 18.1%
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- 2.6%
- Dangerous
- 5%
- Still registered at 10 years
- 96%
Lower fail rate: 18.1%, against 30.0% for the Chevrolet Spark M300, both built around 2015.
27,155 MOT tests on cars built around 2015
- 4

SEAT Mii
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 19.9%
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- 2.9%
- Dangerous
- 3.7%
- Still registered at 10 years
- 95.4%
Lower fail rate: 19.9%, against 30.0% for the Chevrolet Spark M300, both built around 2015.
3,708 MOT tests on cars built around 2015
- Fail rate
- = the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests.
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- = the share of MOT tests that failed and still hadn't passed 3 days later. A fail that passed a retest within 3 days, even the same day, isn't counted.
- Dangerous
- = the share of MOT tests where the tester marked a fault as dangerous. It is against the law to drive the car until it is fixed.
- Still registered at 10 years
- = the share of cars still registered (taxed or declared off the road) 10 years after they were first registered.
How many are still registered
Not enough registration data to show this for the Chevrolet Spark.
The share still registered can reflect demand, the cost of repairs, exports, write-offs and how owners use the car. It isn't proof of how long the car lasts mechanically.
Recall context
DVSA's recall list has no recalls filed under the Chevrolet Spark name. For the exact car, check with the maker or GOV.UK's recall checker.
How Spark M300 cars have aged
How Spark M300 cars have aged
How fail rates have changed as these cars got older. Each line follows cars first registered in about the same year across several years of MOT data. Not a prediction for any one car.
M300 variants compared
Most common issues on Chevrolet Sparks of this age
This list covers every Chevrolet Spark built around 2015, whichever generation it is. We don't have a defect list for the M300 on its own.
Most common advisories and fails
In order of the share of MOT tests that recorded each one
- 128.5%Advisory
Brake pipe corroded or covered in grease
- 218.0%Advisory
Tyre worn close to the legal limit or worn on the edge
- 316.0%Advisory
Suspension arm pin or bush worn, but not moving too much
- 411.5%Advisory
Brake binding slightly
- 511.0%Advisory
Tyre slightly damaged, cracking or perishing
Based on 200 tests
Looking at a Chevrolet Spark M300?
Enter its number plate to see its full MOT history, risk rating and running costs.
Frequently asked questions
Built around 2015 (10 years old), the Chevrolet Spark M300 (2010-2015) fails MOTs noticeably more often than typical for this age. This is based on 200 10-year-old MOT tests from DVSA data. Each retest counts as a test.