Chevrolet Matiz M200 (Daewoo Matiz facelift) (2005-2008) reliability
Chevrolet Matiz M200 (Daewoo Matiz facelift) built around 2008: more dangerous faults than average
Testers find a dangerous fault on Chevrolet Matiz M200 (Daewoo Matiz facelift) models built around 2008 more often than on similar cars the same age. Look closely at the brakes on any car you view. An independent inspection matters more than the wider numbers on cars this old.
Looking at a Chevrolet Matiz M200 (Daewoo Matiz facelift) right now?
Enter its number plate to see its full MOT history, risk rating and running costs.
Key figure
9% of MOT tests on Chevrolet Matiz M200 (Daewoo Matiz facelift) models built around 2008 found a fault the tester marked as dangerous, against 7% for similar cars the same age.
Most common issue
The most common MOT issue on Chevrolet Matiz M200 (Daewoo Matiz facelift) models built around 2008 involves the brakes.

Based on 6,535 tests of Matiz models registered 2005-2008.
About 1 in 8 Matiz M200 (Daewoo Matiz facelift) MOTs (11.8%) failed and still hadn't passed 3 days later. That's for cars built around 2008 (17 years old), all fuels combined.
Based on 2,345 tests (DVSA MOT results, 2025). A fail that passed a retest within 3 days, even the same day, isn't counted. Nor is a fail with no later MOT on record.
About 1 in 10 Matiz M200 (Daewoo Matiz facelift) MOTs (9.2%) found at least one dangerous defect. These are cars built around 2008 (17 years old).
Based on 2,345 tests (DVSA MOT results, 2025). Dangerous is the most serious grade an MOT gives: a direct risk to road safety.
M200 (Daewoo Matiz facelift) fail rate by age
Fail rate is the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests. How we count fail rates Build years are worked out from age, so they are approximate. Tests counted are 2025 MOTs. Highest fail rate at 20 years old.
How the Matiz M200 (Daewoo Matiz facelift) compares
At each age below, see how the Matiz M200 (Daewoo Matiz facelift) holds up against other cars the same age. The averages combine all fuel types.
Based on 4,506 tests across 6 Chevrolet models, built around 2008 (17 years old).
Fail rate is the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests. How we count fail rates Build years are worked out from age, so they are approximate. Tests counted are 2025 MOTs.
What to check before viewing
The model's most common MOT issues, turned into things you can ask about or look for.
Independent inspection
High priorityHave an independent specialist inspect the car before you commit.
Brake pipes and hoses
High priorityLook under the car for corrosion or chafing on the rigid brake pipes near the rear axle.
Suspension bushes and joints
Worth checkingListen for knocks over speed bumps and ask about recent control-arm or anti-roll-bar work.
Tyres
Worth checkingCheck tread depth across the full width on all four; uneven wear suggests alignment or suspension issues.
Suspension
Worth checkingInspect the suspension carefully and ask the seller for repair history.
Vehicle-specific check
Worth checkingCheck the car’s number plate on MOT Wise to see its own MOT history and any recalls for its build years.
Other hatchbacks to compare
Other hatchbacks, with each one's figures taken at the same age as the Matiz M200 (Daewoo Matiz facelift).
- 1

Daihatsu Sirion
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 28.3%
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- 7.2%
- Dangerous
- 6.2%
Lower fail rate: 28.3%, against 35.4% for the Chevrolet Matiz M200 (Daewoo Matiz facelift), both built around 2008.
1,990 MOT tests on cars built around 2008
- 2

Nissan Micra
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 30.5%
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- 5.9%
- Dangerous
- 5.6%
- Still registered at 10 years
- 96%
Lower fail rate: 30.5%, against 35.4% for the Chevrolet Matiz M200 (Daewoo Matiz facelift), both built around 2008.
3 critical recall campaigns matching this model/build period.
17,936 MOT tests on cars built around 2008
- 3

Hyundai i10
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 31.7%
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- 7.3%
- Dangerous
- 8.7%
- Still registered at 10 years
- 95.5%
Lower fail rate: 31.7%, against 35.4% for the Chevrolet Matiz M200 (Daewoo Matiz facelift), both built around 2008.
3,187 MOT tests on cars built around 2008
- 4

Hyundai Getz
Same body type, tested at the same age
- Fail rate
- 32.7%
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- 7.4%
- Dangerous
- 8.2%
Lower fail rate: 32.7%, against 35.4% for the Chevrolet Matiz M200 (Daewoo Matiz facelift), both built around 2008.
5,004 MOT tests on cars built around 2008
- Fail rate
- = the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests.
- Fail, no pass in 3 days
- = the share of MOT tests that failed and still hadn't passed 3 days later. A fail that passed a retest within 3 days, even the same day, isn't counted.
- Dangerous
- = the share of MOT tests where the tester marked a fault as dangerous. It is against the law to drive the car until it is fixed.
- Still registered at 10 years
- = the share of cars still registered (taxed or declared off the road) 10 years after they were first registered.
Recall context
DVSA's recall list has no recalls filed under the Chevrolet Matiz name. For the exact car, check with the maker or GOV.UK's recall checker.
What has gone wrong on Matiz M200 (Daewoo Matiz facelift) cars built around 2008
The share of petrol cars that have ever failed an MOT on each part of the car. Based on 499 cars.
Rust, which the MOT calls corrosion: 22% of these cars show rust-related issues at this age.
Check the sills, subframe and brake pipes before you decide.
How Matiz M200 (Daewoo Matiz facelift) cars have aged
How Matiz M200 (Daewoo Matiz facelift) cars have aged
How fail rates have changed as these cars got older. Each line follows cars first registered in about the same year across several years of MOT data. Not a prediction for any one car.
How each part holds up as M200 (Daewoo Matiz facelift) cars age
How each part holds up as M200 (Daewoo Matiz facelift) cars age
The share of petrol cars built 2005-2008 that have ever failed an MOT on each part of the car. Rates usually rise with age, but can dip slightly as cars leave the road.
| Part of the car | 17 years | 18 years | 19 years | 20 years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suspension | 61% | 57% | 63% | 57% |
| Brakes | 73% | 80% | 72% | 69% |
| Emissions | 35% | 40% | 42% | 50% |
| Tyres | 53% | 57% | 61% | 61% |
| Lighting | 61% | 57% | 67% | 62% |
| Drivetrain | 10% | 16% | 12% | 20% |
| Bodywork | 6% | 14% | 25% | 27% |
| Steering | 6% | 6% | 5% | 5% |
| Corrosion | 22% | 25% | 31% | 39% |
Based on petrol cars in the 2005-2008 build-year band, from 358 to 504 cars at each age.
M200 (Daewoo Matiz facelift) variants compared
Most common issues on Chevrolet Matizes of this age
This list covers every Chevrolet Matiz built around 2008, whichever generation it is. We don't have a defect list for the M200 (Daewoo Matiz facelift) on its own.
Most common advisories and fails
In order of the share of MOT tests that recorded each one
- 125.8%Advisory
Suspension arm pin or bush worn, but not moving too much
- 223.6%Advisory
Brake pipe corroded or covered in grease
- 322.5%Advisory
Tyre worn close to the legal limit or worn on the edge
- 415.8%Advisory
Tyre slightly damaged, cracking or perishing
- 513.7%Advisory
Exhaust has a minor leak
Based on 2,345 tests
Looking at a Chevrolet Matiz M200 (Daewoo Matiz facelift) right now?
Enter its number plate to see its full MOT history, risk rating and running costs.
Frequently asked questions
Built around 2008 (17 years old), the Chevrolet Matiz M200 (Daewoo Matiz facelift) (2005-2008) fails MOTs noticeably more often than typical for this age. This is based on 2,345 17-year-old MOT tests from DVSA data. Each retest counts as a test.