Skip to main content
Check
Nissan

Nissan Pulsar reliability by build year

Coverage 2014-20181 named generationHatchbackPETROL / DIESEL
At a glance

Nissan Pulsar built around 2018: about average at the MOT

Nissan Pulsars built around 2018 fail their MOT about as often as similar cars the same age.

Check a Nissan Pulsar by number plate

Key figure

19% of MOT tests on Nissan Pulsars built around 2018 ended in a fail (retests included), against 16% for similar cars the same age.

Most common issue

The most common MOT issue on Nissan Pulsars built around 2018 involves the tyres.

Before you view it

What to check before viewing

The Nissan Pulsar's most common MOT issues, turned into things to ask about or look for.

Brake pads

High priority

Ask when the pads were last replaced and check the warning-light history.

Brake discs

High priority

Ask for the date and mileage of the last disc replacement; visually check for a deep wear lip and rust pitting on each disc.

Tyres

Worth checking

Check tread depth across the full width on all four; uneven wear suggests alignment or suspension issues.

Suspension bushes and joints

Worth checking

Listen for knocks over speed bumps and ask about recent control-arm or anti-roll-bar work.

Vehicle-specific check

Worth checking

Check the car’s number plate on MOT Wise to see its own MOT history and any recalls for its build years.

By build year

How build years differ

Fail rates have been steady over the last three years. Use the build-year guide below to separate newer build years from older ones.

Find your Pulsar's generation

Each card below is a different generation. Select your year and we'll highlight the match.

Pulsar C13

C13 (2014-2018)

Too close to call between ratings
DIESELPETROL

18.7% fail rate, built around 2018 (7 years old)

Fails more often than the average car this age (about 1 in 6 MOTs, 16.6%)

From 3,580 MOT tests at this ageView details →
Pre

Older models (before 2005)

PETROL

12.5% fail rate, built before 2000 (over 25 years old)

Likely between 6.2% and 23.6%

Fails less often than the average car this age (about 1 in 4 MOTs, 25.2%)

From 56 MOT tests at this ageLimited data

Not sure which one you're looking at?

Match your build year to its generation, then see the fail rates for those build years of the Nissan Pulsar.

See every build year for the Nissan Pulsar

Side-by-side

Nissan Pulsar generations compared

Each generation is shown at 7 years old if it has at least 100 MOT tests at that age. If not, or if its cars are too new to be 7, it's shown at another age. We try ages close to 7 first. Newer generations have fewer years of data.

GenerationRatingFail rate
C13 (2014-2018)
No ratingToo close to call between ratings
No ratingToo close to call between ratings18.7%built around 2018 (7 years old)from 3,580 MOT tests at this age
Older models (before 2005)
No rating
No rating12.5%likely between 6.2% and 23.6%built before 2000 (over 25 years old)from 56 MOT tests at this age

Each row is one generation of the Pulsar, shown at the age printed under its fail rate. So rows can be different ages. Fail rate is the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail, retests included. A rating is given only when there are enough tests to place the fail rate in one rating band with 95% confidence.

By age

Nissan Pulsar fail rate by age

This chart combines every Nissan Pulsar ever sold. It's good for the big picture. For one generation, scroll up to the build-year cards.

Below typicalAbove typicalHigh (28% or more)Highest fail rate
Age / builtFail rateMOT tests
6 yearsbuilt around 2019
65517.0%
7 yearsbuilt around 2018
3,58018.7%
8 yearsbuilt around 2017
6,15820.6%
9 yearsbuilt around 2016
8,77124.0%
10 yearsbuilt around 2015
6,92826.2%
11 yearsbuilt around 2014
68226.5%
25+ yearsbuilt 2000 or earlier
5612.5%

Fail rate is the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests. How we count fail rates Build years are worked out from age, so they are approximate. Tests counted are 2025 MOTs. Highest fail rate at 11 years old.

Where it ranks

Where the Nissan Pulsar stacks up

Three ways to compare the same cars, built around 2018 (7 years old). The fail rate is the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests, and 1st has the lowest fail rate. Only models with at least 500 MOT tests at this age are ranked. How we count fail rates

Against other Nissan models

6th of 9

6th lowest fail rate of 9 Nissan models with enough MOT tests to rank, at this age.

In the middle third

Against other hatchbacks

60th of 84

60th lowest fail rate of 84 hatchbacks with enough MOT tests to rank, at this age.

Close to the middle third

Against the UK average

18.7%

The share of this model's MOT tests at this age that ended in a fail.

Fails more often than the average car this age (about 1 in 6 MOTs, 16.6%)

All generations of this model

What goes wrong most often on 7-year-old Nissan Pulsars

These issues come from 7-year-old Nissan Pulsars, every generation combined.

All generations of this modelEnough data

Most common advisories and fails

In order of the share of MOT tests that recorded each one

  1. 1
    Advisory

    Tyre worn close to the legal limit or worn on the edge

    18.5%
    Advisory: 933Fail: 104 (10% of the times it was found)
  2. 2
    Advisory

    Brake pads wearing thin

    17.0%
    Advisory: 707Fail: 114 (14% of the times it was found)
  3. 3
    Advisory

    Suspension arm pin or bush worn, but not moving too much

    11.3%
    Advisory: 444Fail: 101 (19% of the times it was found)
  4. 4
    Advisory

    Tyre slightly damaged, cracking or perishing

    9.0%
    Advisory: 420Fail: 66 (14% of the times it was found)
  5. 5
    Advisory

    Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened

    7.3%
    Advisory: 379Fail: 2 (1% of the times it was found)

Based on 3,580 MOT tests on 7-year-old Nissan Pulsars, every generation combined.

All generations of this model

Issues that often appear together

The pairs seen most often when an MOT on 7-year-old Nissan Pulsars notes problems with more than one part of the car.

Issues that often appear together on this model

All generations of this modelPlenty of data
  1. Brakes + Tyres36%
  2. Brakes + Suspension25%
  3. Suspension + Tyres24%
  4. Other + Tyres14%

Both were noted at the same test. That doesn't mean one caused the other.

Across 1,024 MOT tests on Nissan Pulsar cars built around 2018 (7 years old) where more than one part of the car was noted.

Still registered

How many are still registered, and recalls

How many of these are still registered in the UK, and what's been recalled across the model.

How many are still registered

91%of this model's cars first registered in 2014 to 2015 were still registered 10 years later

UK average for cars first registered in 2014 to 2015: 92% · About typical

The share still registered can reflect demand, the cost of repairs, exports, write-offs and how owners use the car. It isn't proof of how long the car lasts mechanically.

Source: DfT vehicle licensing statistics (VEH0124).

Recall context

3 recalls in all

All 3 Nissan Pulsar recalls cover cars built in these years.

  • 3 recalls

Top concerns

  • Possible reduced retention force of the rear door child lock switch
  • Rear oxygen sensor may fail
  • Headlight auto levelling system may malfunction when vehicle is fully laden

For the exact car, check GOV.UK's recall checker with the number plate.

Like-for-like

Other hatchbacks to compare

Other hatchbacks to compare

  1. 1

    Mini

    Same body type, tested at the same age

    Fail rate
    12.3%
    Still registered at 10 years
    95.6%

    Lower fail rate: 12.3%, against 18.7% for the Nissan Pulsar, both built around 2018.

    Some figures could not be compared for these two cars. So this comparison uses the fail rate, share still registered and recalls only.

    50,561 MOT tests on cars built around 2018

  2. 2

    Suzuki SX4

    Same body type, tested at the same age

    Fail rate
    13.5%

    Lower fail rate: 13.5%, against 18.7% for the Nissan Pulsar, both built around 2018.

    Some figures could not be compared for these two cars. So this comparison uses the fail rate and recalls only.

    3,314 MOT tests on cars built around 2018

  3. 3

    Lexus CT

    Same body type, tested at the same age

    Fail rate
    10.5%
    Fail, no pass in 3 days
    1.1%
    Dangerous
    4.2%
    Still registered at 10 years
    88.2%

    Lower fail rate: 10.5%, against 18.7% for the Nissan Pulsar, both built around 2018.

    3,255 MOT tests on cars built around 2018

  4. 4

    Toyota Prius

    Same body type, tested at the same age

    Fail rate
    11.1%
    Fail, no pass in 3 days
    0.9%
    Dangerous
    3.5%
    Still registered at 10 years
    94.4%

    Lower fail rate: 11.1%, against 18.7% for the Nissan Pulsar, both built around 2018.

    5 critical recall campaigns matching this model/build period.

    17,367 MOT tests on cars built around 2018

Fail rate
= the share of MOT tests that ended in a fail. Retests count as tests.
Fail, no pass in 3 days
= the share of MOT tests that failed and still hadn't passed 3 days later. A fail that passed a retest within 3 days, even the same day, isn't counted.
Dangerous
= the share of MOT tests where the tester marked a fault as dangerous. It is against the law to drive the car until it is fixed.
Still registered at 10 years
= the share of cars still registered (taxed or declared off the road) 10 years after they were first registered.

Common questions

Frequently asked questions

Built around 2018 (7 years old), the Nissan Pulsar across all generations combined fails MOTs slightly more often than typical for this age. It has the 6th lowest fail rate of 9 Nissan models with enough MOT tests to rank, at this age. This is based on 3,580 7-year-old MOT tests from DVSA data. Each retest counts as a test.

These figures come from DVSA's MOT records. Across every Nissan Pulsar ever sold: 26,830 tests. The main figures are for cars built around 2018 (7 years old): 3,580 tests. They are a guide, not a guarantee. Always inspect the car or have a mechanic check it.